 | The attached tables
will aid in MIC interpretation and antibiotic selection. |
What is the MIC?
The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) is determined by
inoculating the organism into a series of test wells, usually 4 to 6, that
contain a standard amount of broth and serial dilutions of the antibiotic being
tested. Following a period of incubation, the wells are examined for growth.
The MIC number is the lowest concentration of drug that inhibits growth of the
pathogen. Usually, successful treatment of infection can be achieved by merely
inhibiting multiplication of the microorganism and relying on a healthy immune
system.
The amount of antibiotic required to inhibit growth is not the same as the
amount required to actually kill the organism. The Minimal Bactericidal
Concentration (MBC) is usually several dilutions greater than the MIC. This fact
becomes important to remember when treating patients with compromised immune
systems.
In infections where the host's natural defense mechanisms are impaired,
successful treatment depends upon achieving bactericidal concentrations of
antibiotic.
How is the MIC reported?
When you receive a report from IDEXX Veterinary Services, you will see the
name of the organism, followed by a list of the antibiotics that have been
tested against that organism. We test a panel of antibiotics known to be
appropriate for the organism. Our antibiotic panels have been designed based on
recommendations set by the National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS).
This organization recommends standards for all laboratory testing (human and
veterinary).
Following each antibiotic listed you will find one of three letters:
S(Susceptible), I(Intermediate), or R (Resistant). This is followed by a number
(the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration in µg/mL) which is the lowest drug
concentration that inhibited the growth of the organism.
When "<=" is listed in the report, the organism was inhibited at
the lowest dilution tested for that drug.
Example: Ampicillin S <= 0.25. Interpretation:
This organism is susceptible to Ampicillin at the lowest dilution tested.
How to Use the MIC number
The MIC number for one antibiotic can NOT be compared to the MIC number for
another antibiotic because a MIC cannot be interpreted based on absolute values
alone. You also have to know the range tested and the breakpoint for each
antibiotic.
The MIC is the lowest concentration of drug in ug/mL that inhibits the growth of
a strain of bacteria. The Breakpoint is the highest plasma concentration of the
drug that can safely be achieved in the patient. This corresponds to the lowest
concentration listed in the "R" section of the table on the next page
"MIC Ranges Tested".
The Breakpoint differs by drug and species of animal and is based on
pharmacokinetic testing of the drug in that species to determine half-life,
routes of excretion, and volume of distribution.
For example, if we look at Ampicillin, the breakpoint for resistance against
gram negative bacteria is 32 µg/ml. The testing range for Ampicillin is 0.25 -
32 µg/mL. An E. coli with a MIC <= 8 is interpreted as susceptible, an MIC
of 16 is intermediate, and >= 32 is resistant. An E. coli with a MIC of 1 ug/mL
is considered more susceptible than an E. coli of 8 µg/ml, and an E. coli of
>=32 ug/ml is considered resistant to Ampicillin.
Some antibiotics have different MIC ranges and Breakpoints for different types
of bacteria. In general the higher the MIC within the range tested, the less
likelihood that the organism will be susceptible.
MIC interpretations, except for urines, are based on plasma levels but some
antibiotics reach much higher tissue levels than plasma levels. This fact is
important if an organism shows resistance to most or all antibiotics tested. If
the MICs are in the >= R range, these antibiotics cannot reach a known
inhibitory concentration. In those cases, it may be that an antibiotic must be
selected by determining which choice can reach higher concentrations in the
affected tissue.
Increasing the dose and/or the frequency of administration may help inhibit
resistant organisms. Remember that in most cases, the patient's natural defense
mechanisms work with the antibiotic to result in a successful response.
The following MIC KEY is to help interpret the MIC value on the microbiology
report.
| If
the result is: |
Then
the antibiotic is: |
Further
info/action: |
| S
<= (any number) |
Effective
at lowest dilution tested. |
Should
be effective in serum or urine. |
| S
(any number) |
Effective,
but not at lowest dilution tested. |
Refer
to MIC ranges to determine where in range it tested and decide if it is
a good choice. |
| I
(any number) |
May
be effective in high dosages, or if it concentrates in the site. |
Refer
to references for achievable Antibiotic levels in affected tissue. |
| R
(any number) |
Will
be unlikely to reach effective serum levels. |
Choose
an antibiotic that tests susceptible. (See below). |
| R
>= (any number) |
Unlikely
to be effective. |
Choose
an antibiotic that tests susceptible. However, if all antibiotics are
resistant, an antibiotic may need to be chosen that can reach higher
levels in the affected tissue than in the plasma. |
When determining which antibiotic is best, consider safety, ease-of-use,
and cost along with the MIC and the S-I-R interpretation.
The charts on the next page should help in your decision process. Listed below
are several good references if you would like additional information; or call
our clinical pathology/internal medicine consultants at 1-800-444-4210 (option
1).
Target, Antimicrobial
Reference Guide to Effective Treatment, David Aucoin, DVM, North American
Compendiums Inc., 2nd edition, 2000.
Infectious Disease of the Dog and Cat, Greene, W.B. Saunders, 2nd
edition, 1998.
Package inserts from Antibiotics.
MIC Ranges Tested and Interpretation
|
ANTIBIOTIC
|
ORGANISM TYPE
TESTED
|
Test Range ug/mL
|
Interpretations
Based on Plasma Levels of Antibiotic
|
|
Interpretation
Based on Urine Levels of Antibiotic
|
|
|
|
|
S
|
I
|
R
|
|
S
|
R
|
| Amikacin |
Gram
neg |
2-64
|
2-16
|
32
|
64
|
|
2-32
|
64
|
| Amox/Clav |
Gram
neg |
8-32
|
8
|
16
|
32
|
|
8-16
|
32
|
| |
Staph |
2-8
|
2-4
|
|
8
|
|
2-4
|
8
|
| Ampicillin |
Gram
neg |
0.25-32
|
0.25-8
|
16
|
32
|
|
0.25-16
|
32
|
| |
Staph |
0.12-16
|
0.12-0.25
|
|
0.5-16
|
|
0.12-8
|
16
|
| |
Enterococcus |
0.12-16
|
0.12-8
|
|
16
|
|
0.12-8
|
16
|
| Carbenicillin |
Gram
neg, enteric |
16-512
|
16
|
32
|
64-512
|
|
|
|
| |
Gram
neg, Pseudo |
16-512
|
16-128
|
256
|
512
|
|
|
|
| Ceftazidime |
Gram
neg |
8-32
|
8
|
16
|
32
|
|
|
|
| Ceftiofur |
All |
1-8
|
1
|
2-4
|
8
|
|
|
|
| Cephalothin |
All |
2-32
|
2-8
|
16
|
32
|
|
2-16
|
32
|
| Chloramphenicol |
All |
1-32
|
1-8
|
16
|
32
|
|
1-16
|
32
|
| Ciprofloxacin |
Gram
neg |
0.5-4
|
0.5-1
|
2
|
4
|
|
|
|
| Clindamycin |
Staph |
0.5-8
|
0.5
|
1-2
|
4-8
|
|
|
|
| Enrofloxacin |
All |
0.25-2
|
0.25
|
0.5-1
|
2
|
|
0.25-1
|
2
|
| Erythromycin |
Staph |
0.5-8
|
0.5
|
1-4
|
8
|
|
|
|
| Gentamicin |
All |
0.5-16
|
0.5-4
|
8
|
16
|
|
0.5-8
|
16
|
| Nitrofurantoin |
Gram
neg |
32-128
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
|
32-64
|
128
|
| Oxacillin |
Staph |
0.25-8
|
0.25-2
|
|
4-8
|
|
|
|
| Penicillin
G |
Staph |
0.03-16
|
0.03-0.12
|
|
0.25-16
|
|
|
|
| |
Enterococcus |
0.03-16
|
.0.03-8
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
| Piperacillin |
Gram
neg, enteric |
8-256
|
8-16
|
32-64
|
128-256
|
|
|
|
| |
Gram
neg, Pseudo |
8-256
|
8-64
|
|
128-256
|
|
|
|
| Tetracycline |
All |
1-16
|
1-4
|
8
|
16
|
|
1-8
|
16
|
| Ticarcillin |
Gram
neg, enteric |
16-256
|
16
|
32-64
|
128-256
|
|
|
|
| |
Gram
neg, Pseudo |
16-256
|
16-64
|
|
128-256
|
|
|
|
| Tobramycin |
Gram
neg |
0.5-16
|
0.5-4
|
8
|
16
|
|
|
|
| Trimeth/sulfa |
All |
10-320
|
10-40
|
|
80-320
|
|
10-80
|
160-320
|
| Vancomycin |
Staph |
0.5-32
|
0.5-4
|
8-16
|
32
|
|
|
|
| |
Enterococcus |
0.5-32
|
0.5-4
|
8-16
|
32
|
|
|
|
Notes:
1. Urine values are given only if different from serum values.
2. Trimeth/sulfa expressed in combined amount of trimethoprim + sulfa
fractions
Mean Urine Concentrations of Selected Antibiotics
| Antibiotic |
Dosage (mg/kg) |
Route |
Interval |
Mean Urine
Concentration (µg/mL) |
| Ampicillin |
22 |
PO |
8 |
309 |
| Amoxicillin |
11 |
PO |
8 |
201.5 |
| Chloramphenicol |
33 |
PO |
8 |
124 |
| Nitrofurantoin |
4.4 |
PO |
8 |
100 |
| Trimeth/sulfa |
13 |
PO |
12 |
26/79 = 105
(combined) |
| Gentamicin |
2 |
SC |
8 |
107 |
| Amikacin |
5 |
SC |
8 |
342 |
| Cephalexin |
8 |
PO |
8 |
225 |
| Enrofloxacin |
2.5 |
PO |
12 |
40 |
| Tetracycline |
18 |
PO |
8 |
138 |
Reference: Infectious
Diseases of the Dog and Cat, Greene, 2nd ed, W.B.Saunders, 1998.
Keep this sheet for reference.